Read this article from the Journal of Medical Insanity. It should make you very sad and/or very angry. But I found this quote interesting:
While accepting that many people would disagree with their arguments, he wrote: “The goal of the Journal of Medical Ethics is not to present the Truth or promote some one moral view. It is to present well reasoned argument based on widely accepted premises.”
I’m hoping that only means that these people are seeking to make a reductio ad absurdum argument—that is, an argument taking a position to its logical conclusion of absurdity. Unfortunately, they probably absolutely believe what they’re saying to be true.
Either way, they’re absolutely correct here; if you accept the pro-choice position, there is no logical reason this should cause you any concern or make you feel uncomfortable.
If, however, you do actually still have some of the common grace of God in your life, you know this is wrong. As such, if you accept the pro-choice position, you are being inconsistent. Please, turn from your sin and ask God to forgive you on the basis that Christ died to pay the penalty for the sins of his people, because “If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness” (1 John 1:9).